YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 248 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor DependencyGraph (7ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (193ms).
 | – Problem 3 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (0ms).

Problem 1: DependencyGraph



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

max#(N(L(x), N(y, z)))max#(N(L(x), L(max(N(y, z)))))max#(N(L(x), N(y, z)))max#(N(y, z))
max#(N(L(s(x)), L(s(y))))max#(N(L(x), L(y)))

Rewrite Rules

max(L(x))xmax(N(L(0), L(y)))y
max(N(L(s(x)), L(s(y))))s(max(N(L(x), L(y))))max(N(L(x), N(y, z)))max(N(L(x), L(max(N(y, z)))))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: max, 0, s, L, N

Strategy


The following SCCs where found

max#(N(L(x), N(y, z))) → max#(N(y, z))

max#(N(L(s(x)), L(s(y)))) → max#(N(L(x), L(y)))

Problem 2: PolynomialLinearRange4iUR



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

max#(N(L(s(x)), L(s(y))))max#(N(L(x), L(y)))

Rewrite Rules

max(L(x))xmax(N(L(0), L(y)))y
max(N(L(s(x)), L(s(y))))s(max(N(L(x), L(y))))max(N(L(x), N(y, z)))max(N(L(x), L(max(N(y, z)))))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: max, 0, s, L, N

Strategy


Polynomial Interpretation

There are no usable rules

The following dependency pairs are strictly oriented by an ordering on the given polynomial interpretation, thus they are removed:

max#(N(L(s(x)), L(s(y))))max#(N(L(x), L(y)))

Problem 3: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

max#(N(L(x), N(y, z)))max#(N(y, z))

Rewrite Rules

max(L(x))xmax(N(L(0), L(y)))y
max(N(L(s(x)), L(s(y))))s(max(N(L(x), L(y))))max(N(L(x), N(y, z)))max(N(L(x), L(max(N(y, z)))))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: max, 0, s, L, N

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

max#(N(L(x), N(y, z)))max#(N(y, z))