MAYBE
The TRS could not be proven terminating. The proof attempt took 267 ms.
The following DP Processors were used
Problem 1 was processed with processor DependencyGraph (0ms).
| Problem 2 remains open; application of the following processors failed [SubtermCriterion (1ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (57ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), PolynomialLinearRange8NegiUR (37ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), ReductionPairSAT (19ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), SizeChangePrinciple (4ms)].
| Problem 3 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (0ms).
The following open problems remain:
Open Dependency Pair Problem 2
Dependency Pairs
Rewrite Rules
first(0, X) | → | nil | | first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) | → | cons(Y, first(X, Z)) |
from(X) | → | cons(X, from(s(X))) |
Original Signature
Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, from, first, cons, nil
Problem 1: DependencyGraph
Dependency Pair Problem
Dependency Pairs
first#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) | → | first#(X, Z) | | from#(X) | → | from#(s(X)) |
Rewrite Rules
first(0, X) | → | nil | | first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) | → | cons(Y, first(X, Z)) |
from(X) | → | cons(X, from(s(X))) |
Original Signature
Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, from, first, nil, cons
Strategy
The following SCCs where found
first#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → first#(X, Z) |
Problem 3: SubtermCriterion
Dependency Pair Problem
Dependency Pairs
first#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) | → | first#(X, Z) |
Rewrite Rules
first(0, X) | → | nil | | first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) | → | cons(Y, first(X, Z)) |
from(X) | → | cons(X, from(s(X))) |
Original Signature
Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, from, first, nil, cons
Strategy
Projection
The following projection was used:
Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:
first#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) | → | first#(X, Z) |