YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 17 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor DependencyGraph (1ms).

Problem 1: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

quot#(x, 0, s(z))quot#(x, s(z), s(z))quot#(s(x), s(y), z)quot#(x, y, z)

Rewrite Rules

quot(0, s(y), s(z))0quot(s(x), s(y), z)quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z))s(quot(x, s(z), s(z)))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, quot

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

quot#(s(x), s(y), z)quot#(x, y, z)

Problem 2: DependencyGraph



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

quot#(x, 0, s(z))quot#(x, s(z), s(z))

Rewrite Rules

quot(0, s(y), s(z))0quot(s(x), s(y), z)quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z))s(quot(x, s(z), s(z)))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, quot

Strategy


There are no SCCs!