MAYBE
The TRS could not be proven terminating. The proof attempt took 4472 ms.
Problem 1 remains open; application of the following processors failed [DependencyGraph (52ms), SubtermCriterion (1ms), DependencyGraph (15ms), PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (723ms), DependencyGraph (13ms), PolynomialLinearRange8NegiUR (2396ms), DependencyGraph (10ms), ReductionPairSAT (951ms), DependencyGraph (11ms), SizeChangePrinciple (109ms)].
a#(p(x, y), z) | → | a#(y, z) | a#(p(x, y), z) | → | a#(x, z) | |
a#(a(x, y), z) | → | a#(y, z) | a#(lambda(x), y) | → | a#(x, p(1, a(y, t))) | |
a#(a(x, y), z) | → | a#(x, a(y, z)) | a#(lambda(x), y) | → | a#(y, t) |
a(lambda(x), y) | → | lambda(a(x, p(1, a(y, t)))) | a(p(x, y), z) | → | p(a(x, z), a(y, z)) | |
a(a(x, y), z) | → | a(x, a(y, z)) | a(id, x) | → | x | |
a(1, id) | → | 1 | a(t, id) | → | t | |
a(1, p(x, y)) | → | x | a(t, p(x, y)) | → | y |
Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: id, lambda, 1, t, a, p