YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 18 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor DependencyGraph (0ms).

Problem 1: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

f#(cons(x, k), l)g#(k, l, cons(x, k))g#(a, b, c)f#(a, cons(b, c))

Rewrite Rules

f(empty, l)lf(cons(x, k), l)g(k, l, cons(x, k))
g(a, b, c)f(a, cons(b, c))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, g, empty, cons

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

f#(cons(x, k), l)g#(k, l, cons(x, k))

Problem 2: DependencyGraph



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

g#(a, b, c)f#(a, cons(b, c))

Rewrite Rules

f(empty, l)lf(cons(x, k), l)g(k, l, cons(x, k))
g(a, b, c)f(a, cons(b, c))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, g, empty, cons

Strategy


There are no SCCs!