MAYBE
The TRS could not be proven terminating. The proof attempt took 57951 ms.
The following DP Processors were used
Problem 1 was processed with processor PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (0ms).
| Problem 2 was processed with processor PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (0ms).
| | Problem 3 remains open; application of the following processors failed [DependencyGraph (1ms), PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (404ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), PolynomialLinearRange8NegiUR (21850ms), DependencyGraph (0ms), ReductionPairSAT (34532ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), SizeChangePrinciple (29ms)].
The following open problems remain:
Open Dependency Pair Problem 3
Dependency Pairs
p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
Rewrite Rules
p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
Original Signature
Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: b, a, p
Problem 1: PolynomialLinearRange4iUR
Dependency Pair Problem
Dependency Pairs
p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(x3, a(x2)) | | p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(b(a(x1)), b(x0)) |
Rewrite Rules
p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
Original Signature
Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: b, p, a
Strategy
Polynomial Interpretation
- a(x): 0
- b(x): 2
- p(x,y): 2
- p#(x,y): y
Improved Usable rules
p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
The following dependency pairs are strictly oriented by an ordering on the given polynomial interpretation, thus they are removed:
p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(x3, a(x2)) |
Problem 2: PolynomialLinearRange4iUR
Dependency Pair Problem
Dependency Pairs
p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(b(a(x1)), b(x0)) | | p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
Rewrite Rules
p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
Original Signature
Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: b, a, p
Strategy
Polynomial Interpretation
- a(x): 2
- b(x): 0
- p(x,y): 1
- p#(x,y): 2x
Improved Usable rules
p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p(p(x3, a(x2)), p(b(a(x1)), b(x0))) |
The following dependency pairs are strictly oriented by an ordering on the given polynomial interpretation, thus they are removed:
p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) | → | p#(b(a(x1)), b(x0)) |